Well Preserved

Taking heart in Psalm 121

Ricki Lake responds… June 18, 2008

Filed under: homebirth, in the news, midwifery, post updates — E V @ 4:33 pm

Lake fires back at AMA for childbirth statement

NEW YORK (AP) — Ricki Lake is firing back at physicians groups that have singled her out for bringing attention to at-home childbirth.

The 39-year-old former talk-show host is named in a recent statement by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that says the home is not the safest setting for having a baby.

In her film “The Business of Being Born,” a documentary about the maternity care system that premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival, Lake is shown giving birth in the bathtub of her Manhattan apartment to her second son Owen, who turns 7 on Wednesday.

The ACOG statement, supported in a resolution Tuesday by the American Medical Association, said, “There has been much attention in the media by celebrities having home deliveries,” citing a “Today Show” headline that read “Ricki Lake takes on the baby birthing industry: Actress and former talk show host shares her at-home delivery in her new film.”

“It’s scary that both (the ACOG and the AMA) have sort of targeted me,” Lake told The Associated Press on Tuesday. “And, you know, I’m all about choice. This is not unlike the abortion issue. I am pro-choice when it comes to childbirth and choices in birth. Home birth was around long before hospitals were taking over — and I just think women need to know (the information) so that they can make the best choice for them.”

The AMA resolves in the statement to support state legislation “that helps ensure safe deliveries and healthy babies by acknowledging that the safest setting” is a hospital, connected birthing center or other approved facility.

“There’s a lot of provocative things that are said in the film,” she said, “but I think it’s very clear that we need doctors, we need the care and the technology that we have. But we also need to value the process of giving birth normally.”

Lake said she had no problems delivering her oldest son Milo, 11, at the hospital, but “looking back on it, I felt that I did not necessarily need the intervention. I didn’t need the (drug Pitocin, which induces labor). I just should have labored on my own.”

The second time around, as long as her pregnancy continued to be low-risk, she decided to give birth at home.

“I was empowered, I was transformed and I would love for women to have had that opportunity — to be an active participant in their own birth choices and birth experience,” she said.

 

The American Medical Association (AMA) vs. me?!?! June 18, 2008

Filed under: birth, homebirth, in the news, midwifery, pregnancy, rant — E V @ 3:20 pm

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF DELEGATES

Resolution: 205

(A-08)

Introduced by: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Subject: Home Deliveries

Referred to: Reference Committee B

(Craig W. Anderson, MD, Chair)

Whereas, Twenty-one states currently license midwives to attend home
births, all using the certified professional midwife (CPM) credential (CPM
or “lay” midwives), not the certified midwives (CM) credential which both
the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and American
College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM) recognize[1]  and

Whereas, There has been much attention in the media by celebrities having
home deliveries, with recent *Today Show* headings such as *”Ricki Lake
takes on baby birthing industry: Actress and former talk show host shares
her at-home delivery in new film”* [2] and

Whereas, An apparently uncomplicated pregnancy or delivery can quickly
become very complicated in the setting of maternal hemorrhage, shoulder
dystocia, eclampsia or other obstetric emergencies, necessitating the need
for rigorous standards, appropriate oversight of obstetric providers, and
the availability of emergency care, for the health of both the mother and
the baby during a delivery; therefore be it

RESOLVED, That our American Medical Association support the recent American
College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) statement that “*the
safest setting for labor, delivery, and the immediate post-partum period is
in the hospital, or a birthing center within a hospital complex, that meets
standards jointly outlined by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and
ACOG, or in a freestanding birthing center that meets the standards of the
Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, The Joint Commission,
or the American Association of Birth Centers”* [3]  (New HOD
Policy); and be it further

RESOLVED, That our AMA develop model legislation in support of the concept
that the safest setting for labor, delivery, and the immediate post-partum
period is in the hospital, or a birthing center within a hospital complex,
that meets standards jointly outlined by the AAP and ACOG, or in a
freestanding birthing center that meets the standards of the Accreditation
Association for Ambulatory Health Care, The Joint Commission, or the
American Association of Birth Centers.” (Directive to Take Action)

[1] <#_ednref1>
http://www.acog. org/departments/ stateleg/ MidwiferyYearinR eview2007. pdf,
accessed March 18, 2008

[2] <#_ednref2> www.today.msnbc. msn.com/id/ 22592397, accessed March 18, 2008

[3] <#_ednref3> www.acog.org/ from_home/ publications
press_releases/ nr02-06-06- 2.cfm<http://www.acog. org/from_ home/publication spress_releases/ nr02-06-06- 2.cfm>,
accessed March 18,2008